Political affinity and investors’ response to the acquisition premium in cross-border M&A transactions – A moderation analysis

This project has been published in the Strategic Management Journal and is co-authored with Christian Fieberg (University of Bremen, Germany), Kerstin Lopatta (University of Hamburg, Germany), and Thomas Tammen (University of Hamburg, Germany).

Abstract

This paper investigates the moderating effect of political affinity between countries on investors’ reactions to the premium in cross-border acquisitions (CBAs). Based on a sample of 1,183 CBAs between 1999 and 2018, we find that political affinity positively moderates the relationship between the acquisition premium and the acquiring and target firms’ stock market return. We argue that investors use political affinity to assess the reliability of the premium (i.e., management’s overall perception of a given deal’s synergistic potential). This is in line with prior literature reasoning that, unlike strong political affinity, weak political affinity increases the likelihood of government intervention, decreases the likelihood of deal completion, and results in higher premiums to mitigate the previous effects, thus potentially increasing the likelihood of value destruction.

To access the full paper, click here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: